Eucalyptus Grandis vs Pinus      
   
creosote treated transmission pole in service
  Comparative report between Eucalyptus Grandis / Pinus Svlvestris: This report was compiled by an independent authority. We trust that this report will nullify any doubts about the application of Eucalyptus timber for transmission pole purposes.  
 
 
Botanical Name
Eucalyptus Grandis
(Gum)

Pinus Sylvestris
(Scots Pine/Red Wood) Substitutes : Pinus pinaster, Pinus Radiata

Distribution
Eastern Australia (Natural), South Africa (Commercially grown plantations)
Europe Northern Asia
Hard/Softwood
Hardwood
Softwood
Density
680-800 Kg/m³
380-610 Kg/m³
Modules of Rupture
128MPA
66 MPA
Modules of Elasticity
16772MPA
9467 MPA
Compression Grain
64.51 MPA
35.2 MPA
Toughness (Serviceability)
Poles are used in a wide range of applications from dry dessert conditions to marine jetties, (Some poles are still in service after 80yrs)
Wide range of applications. Good service life.
Drying
The wood seasons well. Hairline cracks dc appear on the surface of the timber at times. Very few knots. Does not form knot clusters, therefore no weakness due to knots.
The wood seasons well. Knots may become troublesome when dried. Knot clusters can cause weakness in poles
Preservation
Preserves well Creosote, CCA
Preserves well Creosote. CCA
Pole Production
Producers uniform poles that are extremely durable and are superior strength in relation to volume in comparison to pine softwood varieties,
Uniform durable poles.
Cost
Very cost effective. Can scale down on minimum dia requirements due to strength properties,
Cost effective versus steel and concrete poles.
Availability
Excellent. Can despatch to any destination worldwide.
Good.
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
A Creosote Treated, fence pole in service
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Copyright © Phillip Sharl van Zuydam, 2006. All rights reserved.